Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Prescott, the Bloggers, the "Hoodies" and Bicycles

Polititaholic will be on holiday for the next few weeks (on a bicycle in Norway). Parting thoughts: the survival of Prescott thus far is astonishing (and is not what I predicted weeks ago: I thought he would be gone by now). However the end cannot be far away: the latest allegations about the Dome-Casino shred what's left of his reputation (even New Labour's portly proletarian could not resist the allure of the mega-rich). It looks as if he will stay on as Deputy Leader but resign as Deputy PM. That, of course, would mean a Deputy Leadership election in the autumn; which could, in turn, trigger a Leadership election. There is, of course, no constitutional mechanism for removing Prescott: if Blair doesn't sack him he could sit tight and Blair has every reason to keep him where he is. The role of bloggers in bringing down Prescott has attracted a lot of attention: Guido Fawkes had a piece in yesterday's Guardian. Let's face it, Guido and Iain Dale are both excellent bogs, but they both have a right-wing Conservative political agenda. They are willing to mock "Dave" (because they are further to the right than he is) but reserve their fire mostly for attacks on Labour. In this respect they are unlike Private Eye which, although stuffed full of the same public-school types and conservative with a small "C", genuinely has no political agenda: it will go after anyone in power of whatever party with equal relish. I don't think this is true of Guido and Iain Dale. On the other hand, both do seem to be well-informed about what goes on "inside the beltway" and, especially in the case of Guido, one does sometimes wonder if his blog is entirely an independent effort (he seems to have nothing else to do). Finally, Cameron seems to have misjudged things so far as "Hoodies" are concerned. What he seems to be saying is, in fact, sensible: wearing a hood doesn't make a teenager a thug; if thugs wear hoods it is the thuggishness that is objectionable, not the hood. Teenagers wear these things to be like other teenagers. There is obviously a problem with out-of-control teenagers in inner-cities, but their sartorial choices are not the main problem. But Cameron got the "mood music" wrong: "Hug a Hoodie" is a gift to critics of Cameron's shallowness and spin (his Blairish qualities) and it won't endear him to younger voters (who regard it as risible): it's not quite a Hague "baseball cap" moment, but its close. Anyway, I'm off on my bicycle (and no, I won't be followed by a chauffeur-driven car carrying my luggage, I'll be carrying the damn stuff myself).

2 Comments:

Blogger Shaun (ed.) said...

But Cameron got the "mood music" wrong: "Hug a Hoodie" is a gift to critics of Cameron's shallowness and spin (his Blairish qualities) and it won't endear him to younger voters (who regard it as risible): it's not quite a Hague "baseball cap" moment, but its close.

Many of Cameron's proposals over the last few weeks have been gimmicky and all over the place to be frank, but I do not believe that Cameron ever uttered the words "hug a hoodie".
When it was reported on Sunday that Cameron will mention hoodies in his speech on Monday it was Vernon Coaker, a Home Office Minister, who said that "Cameron's empty idea seems to be 'let's hug a hoodie', whatever they have done"

So, basically it was Labour who has effectively managed to spin this into "hug a hoodie" shallowness. As for it having a negative impact, I'm not so sure. This 'softly,cuddly' approach by Cameron may be off putting to traditional Tory voters and men, but it may be attracting many woman voters. Who knows? Hard to judge from the negative internet and media reaction, because most political bloggers and anoraks are men.

4:21 pm  
Blogger skipper said...

Agree re Prezza surviving- I th0ought he'd be gone by the time I got back from holiday. Also re rightwing bias of the two most popular blogs- I find it takes the edge of my enjoyment of reading them. But I would say that as I'm left of centre. Also I'm astonished at their assiduity in blogging so frequently- both obsessives in addition it would seem. But they are both, at the very least, a little bit brilliant so are worth our admiration I feeel sure.

12:03 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home